After months of speculation and projections, the official National Merit Semifinalist cutoffs for the class of 2027 were released September 9th. On average, these are the lowest cutoffs in National Merit history, with all 50 state cutoffs sitting lower than they did last year. Most cutoffs went down at least 3 points from the class of 2026’s figures. Alaska set the pace with a 7-point decline. New Jersey again finished with the highest mark, dropping from 225 to 223. Compass will explore:
- How the class of 2027 results stack up historically and how cutoffs are set
- The lower number of Semifinalists nationally
- Why cutoffs declined so precipitously. Hint: It’s not the students.
- The implications of score instability for students, schools, and states
- What the class of 2028 might expect after they take the PSAT/NMSQT in October 2026 and on what timeline
The junior-year PSAT is also the National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test (NMSQT). Each year, National Merit recognizes the top 55,000 test takers. To be included in that group, students must be among the top 4% of the 1.3 million eligible students who take the PSAT. Of that elite group, approximately 16,500 are recognized as Semifinalists for having the highest scores within their states. Semifinalists have the opportunity to continue in the program to become Finalists and, potentially, scholarship recipients. Some colleges provide significant scholarships and even “full-rides” for Finalists. The remaining 39,000 students are recognized as Commended Students. More information can be found in our National Merit Explained post.
National Merit uses the Selection Index (SI), found on the PSAT score report, to rank students. The Selection Index is calculated by doubling the Reading & Writing score (RW), adding the Math score (M), and dividing that sum by 10. For example, a student with a 720 RW and 700 M score has a Selection Index of 214: (720 x 2 + 700) ÷ 10. A student with a 700 RW and 720 M has a Selection Index of 212. The highest SI a student can receive is 228 (760 RW and 760 M). The weighting of the index means that not all students with the same Total Score have the same SI. “Will a 1450 qualify?” is not the right question. Instead, look at whether a 750 RW and 700 M will qualify.
Summarizing the changes seen for the class of 2027
In October 2015 the PSAT moved to a 320-1520 scale, which was set to provide vertical alignment with the SAT’s 400-1600 scale. The class of 2017 was the first group of students taking the redesigned PSAT/NMSQT, so the fairest comparisons are in the last eleven class years.
This year saw the average Semifinalist cutoff hit a record low. It provided something of a mirror image to the class of 2026. Last year, 11 states set new record highs in the modern PSAT era, and 10 more tied their records. This year, 5 states established new lows, and 18 tied their record lows. Kansas and Minnesota both dropped 2 points below their previous lows, an unusual event for mid-sized states. Even more unusual was what happened in the largest dozen states. None of those has ever seen a drop of more than 3 points, but this year saw California, Illinois, and Michigan fall 4 points.
Results this year were closer to those in the class of 2024 than they were to the previous two years’ results. Recency is not always a predictor of future results. The Commended level, which is set nationally, declined 2 points this year to 208. The Semifinalist cutoffs, in contrast, fell 3 points.
Entry requirements for National Merit versus qualifying for National Merit.
Your PSAT/NMSQT score report tells you whether you meet the eligibility requirements for the NMSP. In general, juniors taking the October PSAT are eligible. If you have an asterisk next to your Selection Index, it means that your answers to the entrance questions have made you ineligible. Your answers are conveniently noted on your score report. If you think there is an error, you will also find instructions on how to contact NMSC. Meeting the eligibility requirements simply means that your score will be considered. Approximately 1.3 million students enter the competition each year. Only about 55,000 students will be named as Commended Students, Semifinalists, Finalists, or Scholars. See National Merit Explained for more information.
Why did the total number of Semifinalists decline?
After recognizing more than 17,000 Semifinalists in the prior two years, the class of 2027 saw only 16,230, a decline of 5%. The decline in Semifinalists is a separate issue from lower cutoffs. Setting cutoffs can be a blunt tool. In a large state, there may be more than 200-300 students at a single score. Small states might have multiple scores with zero students. NMSC can’t always hit its targets on the nose. Below are the largest swings in both directions.
How Semifinalists are allocated among states
It’s possible that NMSC recalibrated the total target number of Semifinalists this year. It helps to understand how National Merit sets cutoffs. NMSC allocates a target number of Semifinalists to states based on their population of high school students, not all of whom take the PSAT. If Texas is allocated 1,500 Semifinalists based on its population of high school graduates, then NMSC works down from a perfect 228 Selection Index until it gets as close as possible to that target. In the class of 2027, 1,462 students scored at or above the cutoff of 219. A cutoff of 220 would have produced too few Semifinalists. A cutoff of 218 would have gone over the allocation. As scores go lower, more and more students occupy each level, and where the crowd forms does not stay consistent from year to year. It is easy for cutoffs to move up or down a point even when there is minimal change in testing behavior or performance. All students at or above a cutoff qualify.
The changes in the above chart fit within the historical pattern, so students should expect similar swings to happen in the future. New Jersey had about the same number of Semifinalists in 2023 as it saw this year, and actually fell from a greater height compared to 2022. Similarly, Texas saw fewer than 1,462 Semifinalists in classes of 2020, 2021, and 2022. And there is little chance that NMSC calculated that Texas’ high school population was falling faster than, say, California’s. We won’t know until next September whether the 16,230 Semifinalists was a fluke or a new standard.
The Mystery of the Declining PSAT Scores
When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. National Merit cutoffs may not have the makings of a Sherlock Holmes novel. The guilty party is too easy to identify and the deduction not all that improbable. To borrow from another mystery trope: it’s College Board in the testing room with a faulty scale.
When test scores change from year-to-year, College Board issues press releases discussing testing patterns and student achievement. What they never include is “That one’s on us.” When it comes to National Merit scores, however, it often is.
A history of change
Over the last seventeen years, there have been six classes that saw cutoffs change in more than forty states. The heat strip below shows how cutoffs shift from year to year.
Even if we eliminate “bounce back” years where scores come back into line after an unusual shift, a major disruption occurs approximately every 4 years. Interestingly, none of those scoring disruptions can be attached to the biggest behavioral disruption of all — the Covid cancellations that drove PSAT/NMSQT volumes below one million for the first time in decades. In addition to last year’s exam, the PSATs from 2011 (class of 2013), 2016 (class of 2018), and 2019 (class of 2021) stand out as problematic. The anomalous 2019 results could be traced back to a particularly mis-scaled form, which I wrote about at the time. The class of 2014 also saw significant changes, but those were more of a bounce-back from the previous year, similar to what we are seeing with the class of 2027.
When Semifinalist cutoffs reached vertiginous levels last year, several theories made the rounds:
- (A) Covid-related learning losses were vanquished
- (B) The integrated Desmos calculator on the digital PSAT had “broken” the Math section
- (C) Test preparation — and maybe AI-enabled test preparation — had made the test too easy
- (D) The test taking population shifted
Compass disputed each of these theories, but it wasn’t until this year’s free-fall that we could put each of them fully to rest. A key piece of evidence is which scores rose and fell.
Over the most recent three PSATs, the highest reported Math scores (College Board groups all 700-760 scores together) did go up on the October 2024 PSAT, but they settled back down on the October 2025 PSAT. If improving Math skills were the key driver, why did they not keep progressing upward? The fall PSAT also provides an inherent double-check, because sophomores and juniors both take the exam in similar numbers. Sophomores and juniors consistently tracked each other across the different exams. The class of 2025 and 2026 overlapped, then 2026 and 2027, and then 2027 and 2028. Every PSAT the movement has been similar. Yet sophomores do not do test preparation in sufficient force to shape score results. The sets of classes were in different points of math development during remote learning, and yet they showed the same rises and falls. Learning loss and test preparation do not provide coherent answers.
Reading & Writing scores were the true driver of the class of 2026 records and the 2027 declines
High RW scores are typically less common than high Math scores. But on the October 2024 PSAT, almost as many students scored 700-760 on RW as on Math. Top scores went up by 18%. The double-weight that RW scores provide in the Selection Index pushed cutoffs to new highs. The 210 Commended ranked only fourth when compared to the previous decade. Earlier class years saw cutoffs of 211 and 212 (twice). So why did last year’s cutoffs rise to levels that had seemed impossible? The highest cutoffs had never exceeded 223 (Maryland’s 224 in the class of 2022 was due to every PSAT in the state being cancelled and students qualifying via SAT scores). How did New Jersey and Massachusetts reach 225 and California, Maryland, Virginia, and Washington end up at 224? The best explanation is that the very top RW scores — 740-760 — increased at an even higher rate than 700-730s. A 225 cutoff is not possible without at least a 750 RW. A 224 requires at least a 740 RW. Students were acing the test in record numbers.
The plummet for the class of 2027
On the 2025 PSAT, the number of high RW scores dropped by 27%. In fact, the RW count for the class of 2027 is even lower than it was two years ago. The surfeit of 700+ scores dried up. Obtaining a 740-760 grew harder. As with Math scores, sophomore performance changes matched that of juniors.
Process of elimination
The rapid gains and collapse eliminate (A), (B), and (C). As sophomores, the class of 2027 was phenomenal at reading according to the PSAT. Post-Covid learning changes cannot explain why they suddenly struggled as juniors. Option (B) doesn’t fit, because Math scores were not the source of the changes. Why would test preparation have stopped working (C), and how can it explain that sophomores and juniors were similarly impacted across the years? This leaves (D) as a remote contender. Except that it fails to explain the 50-state reach of the changes and the magnitude of the changes even in the largest states.
Thirteen of the largest fifteen states dropped by 3 points or more. Pennsylvania and New Jersey saw 2-point declines. If the smaller states were pulling down the class of 2027’s average cutoffs, we might at least attribute some of the disruption to the instability of cutoffs when there are fewer than 100 Semifinalists. That’s not what happened. And if only a few large states saw inflows or outflows of top test takers, the impact would have been muted. Nor did overall test taker numbers change much. When the entire set of large states has this magnitude of a change, the test scale itself has to be at the heart of it.
What does a 3-point change represent and why is it so bad?
For simplicity, the change can be characterized as a 15-point miss in RW on the 160-760 scale (200-800 on the SAT).
- The typical annual growth in RW scores is about 40-50 points, so the scale change represents approximately one-third of an academic year.
- Systematic scaling error is additive to individual student fluctuations in scores — typically around +/-30 points on each side of the PSAT and SAT. Scaling error makes it harder for students to determine where they will score and how their score stacks up.
- Scaling error produces incorrect percentile ranks, because percentiles are based on the 3 prior years of results. Sudden inflation or deflation gives an inaccurate read.
- The PSAT is used for purposes beyond National Merit such as AP placement or state-mandated testing. Results may not align with prior years or academic growth expectations.
- When error happens primarily on one side of the PSAT, some students are unfairly disadvantaged.
- In a competition such as National Merit where relative standing matters, a uniform increase or decrease might be tolerable. A rising tide lifts all students (sort of). Except that there is no way of knowing whether the error applied equally to all students. The digital PSAT is not a single form or even a limited set of forms. Exams across the PSAT testing window can vary, and even on the same test dates, students often see differing questions. It’s one of the security advantages provided by digital testing, but it can also be a curse. College Board provides no reporting on the items or scaling, so students (and Compass) have no way of assessing the impact on individuals. Schools have no way of knowing if their students were hit harder than at other schools.
- This keeps happening. Is College Board having difficulty keeping the digital PSAT scale consistent or will things stay more consistent over time? The historical record says that they will not.
Do these sorts of systematic scaling errors occur on the SAT?
They do. They are harder to spot, but likely even more common. Noted above is that the largest disruptions on the PSAT/NMSQT occur, on average, every 4 years. The SAT is given on (a) 8 national dates every year, (b) during a 2-month SAT School Day window in the spring, and (c) during a 1-month window in the fall. This accelerates the chance for errors. It creates a near certainty that some students will encounter systematic error in their favor and others will see it working against them.
The PSAT and the National Merit Scholarship Program provide a unique laboratory. The PSAT/NMSQT represents one slice in time. The population of PSAT takers is relatively stable from year to year, and the sophomore and junior PSATs provide a sort of longitudinal double-check. The 50 state cutoffs and their varying levels give information about the extent of scaling errors. Comparing ever-shifting SAT dates is difficult, especially because College Board restricts access to the data. It is unfortunate that the primary protection students have is taking the SAT multiple times. In combination with superscoring, it represents the best way for students to lock-in positive error.
How do errors happen? Shouldn’t scores stay consistent?
When new tests are designed, not every problem can be tested on previous populations of students. Instead, a sampling of problems is tested with a sampling of students, perhaps 4-5,000. In theory, that’s a significant enough size that random error will make little difference. The sample group should be comparable to the entire population. Random error is an acceptable part of test creation, because it largely cancels out at scale.
But what if the error is not random? What if the test design is flawed? For example, if the methodology continually overestimates the ability of the sample groups, future questions will be predicted to be harder than they really are. And then over-prediction may happen with the next group. This systematic bias can creep into a test production and equating process. Normally it is spotted. As we see from the October 2024 PSAT and similar examples, sometimes it is not. The National Merit program provides a challenge to test creators, because everything important happens in a narrow part of the scale. On the digital PSAT, only 50 questions count toward a student’s score. Differentiating between a 720 student, for example, and a 730 student, and a 740 student rests on small differences in performance. If College Board has the statistics even slightly off, scores will not align well across tests. We saw the occasional wild ride on the paper PSAT, but the rides may get wilder and more frequent on the digital PSAT.
Predictions and timeline for the class of 2028 and beyond
Compass has always warned students not to be too fixated on a single cutoff target. The crazy events of the last two years have made it obvious that cutoffs can move in large and unexpected ways. It’s better to think in terms of score ranges rather than a pass/fail score. Prior to the PSAT, we can only estimate based on historical figures, without knowing what kind of surprises College Board has in store. After the PSAT, Compass analyzes the national results in the broad buckets that College Board provides. This usually gives a clear idea of which way the overall trend is moving. We should see how RW and Math scores behave, what the 1400-1520 bucket looks like, and develop a tight estimate of the Commended cutoff. For example, here is the estimate from last year.
Unfortunately, it does not provide insight into individual states. In April, the Commended level usually leaks, and we get confirmation of the national trend predictions. It’s not until Semifinalist notifications start being handed out in late August that state-by-state information starts coming into focus.
Below is a pre-PSAT summary. Find the range of potential cutoffs in your state, and how it has stacked up in recent class years. Below the table is more information about the National Merit program. You may also want to consult our post on National Merit Explained, which goes more into the steps of the process, what different honors mean, and what sort of scholarships are available.
State | Class of 2028 (Est Range) | Class of 2027 (Actual) | Class of 2026 (Actual) | Class of 2025 (Actual) | Class of 2024 (Actual) | Avg SF Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 209-216 | 210 | 214 | 212 | 210 | 239 |
| Alaska | 207-217 | 208 | 215 | 214 | 209 | 36 |
| Arizona | 214-220 | 215 | 218 | 217 | 216 | 359 |
| Arkansas | 209-215 | 210 | 215 | 213 | 210 | 145 |
| California | 219-224 | 220 | 224 | 221 | 221 | 2,125 |
| Colorado | 216-221 | 217 | 219 | 218 | 216 | 280 |
| Connecticut | 219-223 | 220 | 223 | 221 | 221 | 182 |
| Delaware | 218-222 | 219 | 220 | 219 | 219 | 43 |
| Florida | 215-219 | 216 | 219 | 217 | 216 | 959 |
| Georgia | 216-220 | 217 | 220 | 218 | 217 | 554 |
| Hawaii | 215-220 | 218 | 219 | 217 | 217 | 62 |
| Idaho | 210-216 | 211 | 215 | 213 | 211 | 90 |
| Illinois | 217-222 | 218 | 222 | 220 | 219 | 693 |
| Indiana | 214-219 | 215 | 218 | 217 | 216 | 320 |
| Iowa | 209-216 | 210 | 214 | 212 | 210 | 152 |
| Kansas | 211-219 | 212 | 216 | 215 | 214 | 147 |
| Kentucky | 210-218 | 211 | 214 | 213 | 211 | 208 |
| Louisiana | 210-217 | 211 | 216 | 214 | 214 | 227 |
| Maine | 211-217 | 214 | 217 | 214 | 213 | 61 |
| Maryland | 220-224 | 221 | 224 | 222 | 221 | 313 |
| Massachusetts | 220-225 | 221 | 225 | 223 | 222 | 322 |
| Michigan | 215-220 | 216 | 220 | 218 | 217 | 509 |
| Minnesota | 213-220 | 214 | 219 | 217 | 216 | 284 |
| Mississippi | 209-215 | 211 | 213 | 212 | 209 | 149 |
| Missouri | 213-217 | 214 | 217 | 215 | 214 | 299 |
| Montana | 207-214 | 208 | 213 | 209 | 209 | 46 |
| Nebraska | 210-216 | 212 | 214 | 211 | 210 | 105 |
| Nevada | 210-218 | 211 | 214 | 214 | 211 | 148 |
| New Hampshire | 213-219 | 215 | 219 | 217 | 215 | 64 |
| New Jersey | 222-225 | 223 | 225 | 223 | 223 | 486 |
| New Mexico | 207-215 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 207 | 99 |
| New York | 219-223 | 220 | 223 | 220 | 220 | 998 |
| North Carolina | 216-220 | 217 | 220 | 218 | 217 | 502 |
| North Dakota | 207-212 | 208 | 210 | 210 | 207 | 28 |
| Ohio | 215-219 | 216 | 219 | 217 | 216 | 588 |
| Oklahoma | 208-216 | 210 | 212 | 211 | 208 | 195 |
| Oregon | 215-221 | 216 | 219 | 216 | 216 | 185 |
| Pennsylvania | 217-221 | 219 | 221 | 219 | 219 | 623 |
| Rhode Island | 212-220 | 213 | 219 | 217 | 215 | 50 |
| South Carolina | 209-217 | 212 | 215 | 214 | 209 | 225 |
| South Dakota | 208-215 | 210 | 211 | 208 | 209 | 39 |
| Tennessee | 213-219 | 214 | 219 | 217 | 217 | 324 |
| Texas | 218-222 | 219 | 222 | 219 | 219 | 1,508 |
| Utah | 208-216 | 209 | 213 | 211 | 209 | 181 |
| Vermont | 211-217 | 212 | 216 | 215 | 212 | 30 |
| Virginia | 219-224 | 221 | 224 | 222 | 219 | 412 |
| Washington | 220-224 | 221 | 224 | 222 | 220 | 353 |
| West Virginia | 207-212 | 208 | 210 | 209 | 207 | 64 |
| Wisconsin | 211-217 | 212 | 215 | 214 | 213 | 295 |
| Wyoming | 207-213 | 208 | 210 | 209 | 207 | 21 |
| District of Columbia | 222-225 | 223 | 225 | 223 | 223 | 36 |
| Studying Abroad | 222-225 | 223 | 225 | 223 | 223 | 87 |
| U.S. Territories | 207-212 | 208 | 210 | 208 | 207 | 39 |
| Commended | 207-212 | 208 | 210 | 208 | 207 |
How cutoffs are determined
Qualifying scores (“cutoffs”) are not based on the total score for the PSAT (320-1520) but on the Selection Index, which is calculated by doubling the RW score, adding the Math score, and then dividing the sum by 10. The maximum Selection Index is 228. Students can find a historical set of cutoff data here or see how Semifinalist and Commended counts have changed state by state. Students still ahead of the October PSAT can prepare with small group PSAT classes built around the Selection Index.
Why does each state have its own Semifinalist cutoff if the program is NATIONAL Merit?
This is always a hot button question. NMSC allocates the approximately 16,500 Semifinalists among states based on the number of high school graduates. That way, students across the nation are represented. It also means that there are very different qualifying standards from state to state. A Massachusetts student with a 220 might miss out on being a Semifinalist. If she lived 10 miles away in New Hampshire, she would qualify.
No Semifinalist cutoff can be lower than the national Commended level. Cutoffs for the District of Columbia and for U.S. students studying abroad are set at the highest state cutoff (typically New Jersey). The cutoff for students in U.S. territories and possessions falls at the Commended level each year. Boarding schools are grouped by region. The cutoff for a given region is the highest state cutoff within the region.
When are National Merit Semifinalists announced?
The lists of Semifinalists will not be distributed to high schools until the end of August 2027. With the exception of homeschoolers, students do not receive direct notification. NMSC asks that schools not share the results publicly until the end of the press embargo in mid-September, but schools are allowed to notify students privately before that date. NMSC does not send Commended Student letters to high schools until mid-September. Compass will keep students updated on developments as the dates approach.
Do state and national percentiles indicate whether a student will be a National Merit Semifinalist?
No! Approximately 1% of test takers qualify as Semifinalists each year, so it is tempting to view a 99th percentile score as indicating a high enough score — especially now that College Board provides students with percentiles by state. There are any number of flaws that rule out using percentiles as a quick way of determining National Merit status.
- Percentiles are based on section scores or total score, not Selection Index
- Percentiles are rounded. There is a large difference, from a National Merit perspective, between the top 0.51% and the top 1.49%
- Percentiles reveal the percentage of students at or below a certain score, but the “at” part is important when NMSC is determining cutoffs.
- The number of Semifinalists is based on the number of high school graduates in a state, not the number of PSAT takers. Percentiles are based on PSAT takers. States have widely varying participation rates.
- Most definitive of all: Percentiles do not reflect the current year’s scores! They are based on the prior 3 years’ performance. They are set even before the test is given. And if you are going to use prior history, why not use the record of prior National Merit cutoffs rather than the highly suspect percentiles?
Entry requirements for National Merit versus qualifying for National Merit.
Your PSAT/NMSQT score report tells you whether you meet the eligibility requirements for the NMSP. In general, juniors taking the October PSAT are eligible. If you have an asterisk next to your Selection Index, it means that your answers to the entrance questions have made you ineligible. Your answers are conveniently noted on your score report. If you think there is an error, you will also find instructions on how to contact NMSC. Meeting the eligibility requirements simply means that your score will be considered. Approximately 1.3 million students enter the competition each year. Only about 55,000 students will be named as Commended Students, Semifinalists, Finalists, or Scholars. See National Merit Explained for more information.
I got a 219 in Michigan. How high are my chances right now? The virus has made it so much harder to predict what’s to come!
Stuv,
Your chances are quite good. Michigan would need to set a new high (22) for you to miss out. I don’t think that is completely impossible (which is why I included it in my range), but it’s extremely unlikely.
Hi Art: My son got a 219 in New York. Any chance with COVID that we could see the cutoff go down and that he could make it that score? Thanks. David
David,
Normally I’d expect to see New York’s cutoff back to 221. Given site closures, I think a 219 cutoff is possible.
Hi Art,
What do you estimate the percentage to be for New York to have a cutoff of 219 considering the number of closures in NYC Schools? (For example, Stuyvesant High school, which had 154 semifinalists last year, were unable to administer both the October and January PSAT) Do you think the odds are around 50/50 for New York to be 219 or do you think it is lower?
Thanks,
John
John,
Thank you for passing along the information on Stuyvesant. That certainly makes things interesting. I’m still hesitant to put a percentage on things in NY, though, given how uncertain things are.
You are my first source for all things National Merit. Thank you. I find the number analysis fascinating – how for California where less kids took the test due to Covid closures you predict a lower qualifying score. So in NY, do you know how many kids actually took the PSAT? My son has a 221. We’re thinking it’s enough, but your range does have up to 222. Financially this is important as we’re looking at merit tied to NMF and hoping he qualifies. I guess we can’t finalize his application list until we know if he made it. What chance do you think there is that NY is 222?
Toby,
I’m afraid I don’t have additional information for you. I certainly like your son’s odds. A 222 cutoff would be unlikely in NY, especially given that a number of school districts were not able to offer the PSAT. As another reader pointed out, Stuyvesant High School in NYC had to cancel its PSAT, and it contributes 150-160 Semifinalists every year.
Hi Art,
Thank you for all the detailed analyses. We are freezing right now in Austin, setting new record lows. Do you have any updated data on testing PSAT testing volumes in Texas? My son’s SI was 220 for the October 2020 exam. I am sure he will get Commended, but I am not sure about anything beyond that.
Ascari,
I hope you and your family are staying safe. Unfortunately, I do not have any data on Texas PSAT volumes. Based on what we’ve seen from SAT testing, Texas likely had more success than California or New York in pulling off October and January testing. In a normal year, I’d expect Texas’s cutoff to be at 220 or 221. Your son’s score is likely to be in the hunt this year.
Hi Art,
I have a 221 (alternate entry) for Maryland. Do you expect the cutoff to stay the same, granting me the semifinalist status?
Thanks
Nicolas,
A lot will depend on how many Maryland students were able to test. In a normal year, I’d expect Maryland’s cutoff to be at 222. I think we’ll see most cutoffs come in below “normal,” but there is not enough state-by-state information to go on.
Does anyone know or have an opinion as to what this will do to the National Recognition Programs?
Luis,
I’d expect a similar impact. However, College Board is not nearly as transparent about its rules and cutoffs.
Do you know the number of juniors who took the January 2021 PSAT or do you get them after their scores are released? Just wondering how that will affect predictions for cutoff scores.
Thank you!
Wally,
We may get word once scores are released. For now, no updates. Keep in mind that even if we do get updated numbers, they’ll reflect national testing.
Hello Mr.Sawyer
I took the ACT (October) and have a score of 34. I did not take the PSAT.
Will I be qualified with the ACT score to apply for a national semifinalist?
Class of 2022
M – 35
S-31
E – 34
W -34
Please respond. Also, I am from California.
Meera,
Unfortunately, the ACT is not used for entry into the National Merit competition. It is only used as a “confirming score” for those students who become Semifinalists. The PSAT is the normal entrance point for the program, and the SAT is used for Alternate Entry when a student is unable to take the PSAT (as was the case for so many students in California).
Thank you, Mr. Sawyer.
I took SAT recently and got a score of 1510 ( from California)
EBRW — 770
Math — 740
Is there a possibility of being the national semifinalist?
If I retook and got a better score, can I submit that score for national semifinalist?
Meera,
NMSC will use your best Selection Index, so you can submit a better score if you retest. In calculating the Selection Index from an SAT score, NMSC caps the 10-40 subscores at 38. Your EBRW may be made up of a 37 and 40 or a 38 and 39, and those would produce slightly different SIs. Your Math subscore would be a 37.
(37 + 38 + 37) * 2 = 224 or (38 + 38 + 37) x 2 = 226.
As long as NMSC follows its previous guidelines, your score should be high enough. There is still the possibility that it will create a new rule to deal with the huge number of students qualifying based on SAT scores.
Is a 217 in Missouri good enough?
Josh,
We won’t know for sure until September, but I think 217 stands an excellent chance in Missouri this year.
My student took the October PSAT in Texas, and then the SAT in December. She didn’t get a qualifying score with the PSAT but bumped up significantly with the SAT with an SSI now in the potential National Merit semifinalist range. With so many students taking the PSAT in January and given the gains research indicates students can make between October and January (especially in math), do you foresee the College Board allowing October PSAT test takers to submit alternate entry scores?
TC,
Congratulations on your student’s improvement on the SAT. Unfortunately, I don’t foresee NMSC changing the Alternate Entry rules this year (although there is much that I don’t foresee!). Alternate Entry has always been about the need for an alternative when PSAT scores are not available. While the January PSAT raises all kinds of new issues, I don’t think NMSC will decide to add even more complexity by accepting PSAT and SAT scores from all students.
Thanks! I was proud of her, especially since her testing center was changed, the new testing center moved her to a different testing room twice after students began filling in demographic info, (they told her to just fill it out during “breaks,” so no breaks for her), and then they started releasing students who finished early before testing time was up. (Fyi, I did report the testing irregularities to CB but didn’t receive a response.) This year is definitely a circus!
I’m sorry that happened. What’s frustrating is that the demographic information is not even required, but proctors often don’t understand that. Let’s hope the circus is leaving town.
Hi Art:
I received a 218 (normal entry) for the state of Georgia. Do you think that will be enough to be a semifinalist? Thank you!
Praneet,
Because of how unusual this year is, we can only make definitive statements about scores that are well below or well above the expected cutoff. A 218 in Georgia falls somewhere in the middle. I’m afraid you’ll need to check back in late August/early September.
Thank you Art! Do you know when commended students, semifinalists, and finalists are announced?
Praneet,
In late August, NMSC will send schools a list of Semifinalists. It is then up to the school to notify individual students. Compass typically finds out about the state cutoffs around Labor Day. In the second week of September, NMSC releases names to the press. The catch is that the press is under no obligation to publish the lists! It’s best for students to hear from their schools, especially since the schools will provide credentials for the Finalist portal.
Schools are mailed (yes, snail mail) Commended announcements the week after the press release of Semifinalists. However, Compass usually finds out the Commended cutoff in the spring. It may be late this year because of the January PSAT.
In late January or early February 2022, schools and students will be notified of Finalist status.
Hi Art,
I stumbled upon your article after doing some research online to discover if anyone else noticed two mistakes with the non-calculator section of the MATH PSAT! I guess you are one of the top PSAT search results! Kudos! At least for the student I was working with, there were two questions the college board had incorrect answers on their answer key. My student thus was marked wrong for two problems that she did indeed get right. For anyone that has access to the Fall 2020 PSAT solution book/answer breakdown, in the non-calculator math section, check #7 and #9. #7’s correct answer is B and #9’s correct answer is C. Maybe this mistake was just specific to her test because surely this mistake would not go un-noticed by people much smarter than me! Any feedback would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
Sean
Sean,
Sorry that it has taken me so long to respond. I would encourage you to reach out to College Board. We had the same issue come up a couple of years ago when one of our Compass tutors uncovered a mistake. I’m only seeing one unscored question (an error) on the Math section at the moment.
Hi Art, My daughter took the October PSAT and got a 224. She took it outside the US. Also, her SAT is 780 Math & 760 Reading. Was wondering on her chances of being a semi-finalist. Thanks
Suresh,
We’ve never seen a cutoff as high as 224, let alone 225. As long as your daughter meets the eligibility requirements, she should be a Semifinalist.
Thanks for your analysis, which is really helpful!!
One thing that confused me a bit. From our child’s 2020 report, it seems like 1400+ lands you in the 99th percentile (user percentile AND national representative sample percentile). Your numbers show otherwise. Any ideas on why there’s a discrepancy?
John,
Perhaps your student is a sophomore? A 1400 is 97th user percentile. Also, the user percentile is based on data for the preceding 3 years and not for 2020.
https://research.collegeboard.org/programs/sat/data/data-tables-technical-resources/psat-nmsqt-score-information
Hi! Thank you so much for being a voice of reason in this crazy test. My son received a 221 in TX – how are his chances? All the data points in his favor, but he is still apprehensive. Thank you!
Rose,
It doesn’t seem like Texas’s cutoff could go above 221. I’d put his chances at 99.9%. The only qualifier I am adding this year is “Unless NMSC decides to change the rules on how it treats Alternate Entry.”
Hey Art! I am a junior who took the PSAT in October of 2020. I got a selection index of 217 in the state of Florida. However, in the time between my PSAT and SAT (March 13), I moved to Georgia. This means National Merit will know that I changed states when I enter the information for my SAT.
My question is, will my semifinalist status be based on the selection index for Florida, or Georgia? 217 is much more plausible for Florida than Georgia.
Thanks!
Ian,
NMSC uses the state of the school you attended when you took the test. In your case, that means Florida.
Hello,
I am a little confused by the score conversion. I live in Georgia, and I scored a 1480 on the SAT (760 EBRW, 720 Math). I am considering taking the SAT again before I send my scores to National Merit, as I know I can improve on math. How should I calculate my current score index? Is it based on how many questions I got right? Thank you for your help.
Kate,
The Selection Index is not based on the number of questions right or wrong. The easiest way to calculate the SI is to ignore the zeros, double the EBRW and add the Math. Your SI was 76×2 + 72 = 224. When calculating an SI from an SAT score, you cap any score at 760 (this is because the PSAT scores only go to 760). That didn’t impact you. Let’s say you test again and get an 800 EBRW and 730 Math. Your SI would only move to 225, because your EBRW score would be capped at 760.
Hi Art…now that the January PSAT scores have been released, are you able to see by state how many juniors took the PSAT between the October and January dates?
Frances,
College Board does not make the state figures available (well, not until next October 2021). I hope to find out more about the January score distributions, but the uneven nature of the administrations means that the uncertainty is likely to remain.
My daughter scored a 213 in Mississippi on the January test. The last four years, the qualifying index score has been 213 (2018), 215 (2019), 214 (2020), and 211 (2021). I see where your expected range for the class of 2022 for Mississippi is 207-215. If you had to put a percentage on her chances of qualifying with a 213 in Mississippi, would you say 50/50; 60/40; 70/30? Or less than 50%? I know this would be an educated guess on your part, but at least it will keep my wife from asking me every night at bedtime between now and September!
Suresh,
Since you put it that way, I have to answer! Mississippi’s cutoffs tend to bounce with the Commended level. My educated guess is that most cutoffs will look more similar to the Class of 2021 cutoffs than, say, the class of 2020 cutoffs. I’ll go with 60/40. We’ll likely have a better idea if the Commended cutoff leaks (as it sometimes does in April). If we see a Commended figure at 209 or lower, I’d re-evaluate my guess as 70/30 or 80/20. The relationship is imperfect this year, since Mississippi may have had more (or fewer) students able to test than did other states.
Hello! I got a 206 selection index (perfect score on math, but didn’t do well on reading). Do you still think that the commended cutoff could be a 206?
I haven’t seen the test taker numbers yet. Depending on how few students were able to take January, a 206 is not out of the question.
Hi Art,
Now that the January scores are released, I’m wondering if your prediction chart stands, or if it might shift again with those scores.
I’m pretty sure my class of 2022 kid’s Washington 214 will be Commended, and not SF. I’d love to be surprised, though. Thanks!
Shannon,
While scores have been released to students, I haven’t received the score distribution information yet. I don’t expect it to remove the uncertainty around cutoffs, since we still won’t know profiles by state. Washington’s cutoff is unlikely to go to 214, but you’ve got the right attitude. These times definitely call for a love of surprise.
Hi Art!
Thank you so much for all of your excellent information!
How did you get the figures for how many people scored at least 1400 on each PSAT (26,103 in October)? The closest I can find is https://reports.collegeboard.org/sat-suite-program-results, which only shows percentages rounded to the nearest whole number.
Thanks!
George,
The figures are from College Board. They are not publicly reported.
Thanks for the quick reply!
I know this may be a hassle, but I would greatly appreciate it if you could tell me the number of sophomores who scored at least 1400 for the 2015, 2016, and 2017 PSATs. I see the corresponding numbers for juniors on this page and for sophomores on the 2018 and 2019 PSATs at https://staging.compassprep.com/major-drop-in-psat-scores/.
Thank you so much!
George,
I don’t have those historical figures for sophomores. There was once a time when College Board was happy to share its figures, but CEO David Coleman has systematically killed off much of its publicly available research. If you want to go back deeper, you can find the old PSAT archives here: https://research.collegeboard.org/programs/psat/data/cb-jr.
Thank you for the info!
Art – Great information. Thank you. What are your latest projections for semifinalist score cutoffs for California?
Sam,
I don’t expect to get enough new information to revise the California estimates. While I think 220-222 is a likely range, anyone who says that the cutoff couldn’t fall anywhere from 217-223 is either operating with a lot more information than I am or a lot less.
Art,
Thank you very much for all of your amazing information.
There are flaws in the current selection process of semi-finalist and these flaws seem to exacerbate the issue of fairness especially this year.
Don’t you think that one way to address it, is for NMSC, to allow juniors that took PSAT in October 2020 or January 2021 to also send their SAT scores when possible?
Allowing juniors to have their highest or average Selection Index between their PSAT and SATs, will ameliorate the situation. They can still base the cutoff on Selection Indexes from juniors that took PSAT, but at least give them a chance to improve their Selection Index, when possible. Example: A junior from California with PSAT score 1450 and SAT score 1600 should have a better Selection Index than another junior from California with SAT score of 1470.
What do you think?
G,
If NMSC had known that the year would turn out the way it did, it might have rethought its procedures. I agree that there is a certain arbitrariness to things. A problem that NMSC faces is that April is typically the time it needs to contact schools to verify eligibility for future Commended students and Semifinalists. If it used SAT scores to establish cutoffs, it would not have enough information early enough. There is also the business relationship between College Board and NMSC that promotes the junior PSAT as the PSAT/NMSQT. I think both organizations would like to preserve that arrangement. Unfortunately, it’s too late in the process for NMSC to alter its policies for the class of 2022. Going forward, it may need to consider a whole new way of handling Alternative Entry.
Hey Art!
The Alternate Entry form states that scores should be received no later than October, but statuses usually seem to come in late August/September. What does this mean?
Also, I know it’s nothing more than an educated guess at the moment, but I’ll take all the information I can get! My index score from the SAT is 223. As a student in California, what would you place my chances of being a Commended or Semifinalist?
Russ,
Historically it has meant that students who send their scores late are tacked on as additional Semifinalists (it’s nice to be on the big announcement, but it’s not necessary).
I’m qualifying everything I say about AE with “If NMSC follows its previous guidelines…,” because it does have the right to change things. If NMSC follows its previous guidelines, then a 223 in CA should be high enough for Semifinalist.
Hi Art, just out of curiosity, do you know how many students get a perfect 228 selection index each year on average? Additionally, for homeschooling families that don’t have a relationship with a high school principal, who typically writes the letter of recommendation which is required to advanced from semifinalist to finalist? We homeschool and are military, so we just moved here to Virginia and don’t know any school officials. Thank you kindly!
Casey,
College Board has never released that information for the PSAT. I’ve done back-of-the-envelope calculations before and estimated a bit less than 0.1% — maybe 1,000-1,200 students.
NMSC doesn’t allow a parent to write the letter, but it does not have to be a school official. Perhaps you’ve worked with a teacher at some point who could write a recommendation.
Hello Art,
I am a little confused by the score conversion. I live in California, and I scored a 1560 on the SAT (360 EBR, 400 W, 800 Math). How should I calculate my current score index? Do you think I may qualify for semi-finalist? Should I consider to take the SAT again before I send my scores to National Merit. Thank you for your help.
Tina,
NMSC caps the EBR, W, and Math scores at the PSAT level of 38. Your Selection Index would be (36 + 38 + 38) * 2 = 224. If NMSC follows its previous guidelines, then that should qualify.