After months of speculation and projections, the official National Merit Semifinalist cutoffs for the class of 2027 were released September 9th. On average, these are the lowest cutoffs in National Merit history, with all 50 state cutoffs sitting lower than they did last year. Most cutoffs went down at least 3 points from the class of 2026’s figures. Alaska set the pace with a 7-point decline. New Jersey again finished with the highest mark, dropping from 225 to 223. Compass will explore:
- How the class of 2027 results stack up historically and how cutoffs are set
- The lower number of Semifinalists nationally
- Why cutoffs declined so precipitously. Hint: It’s not the students.
- The implications of score instability for students, schools, and states
- What the class of 2028 might expect after they take the PSAT/NMSQT in October 2026 and on what timeline
The junior-year PSAT is also the National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test (NMSQT). Each year, National Merit recognizes the top 55,000 test takers. To be included in that group, students must be among the top 4% of the 1.3 million eligible students who take the PSAT. Of that elite group, approximately 16,500 are recognized as Semifinalists for having the highest scores within their states. Semifinalists have the opportunity to continue in the program to become Finalists and, potentially, scholarship recipients. Some colleges provide significant scholarships and even “full-rides” for Finalists. The remaining 39,000 students are recognized as Commended Students. More information can be found in our National Merit Explained post.
National Merit uses the Selection Index (SI), found on the PSAT score report, to rank students. The Selection Index is calculated by doubling the Reading & Writing score (RW), adding the Math score (M), and dividing that sum by 10. For example, a student with a 720 RW and 700 M score has a Selection Index of 214: (720 x 2 + 700) ÷ 10. A student with a 700 RW and 720 M has a Selection Index of 212. The highest SI a student can receive is 228 (760 RW and 760 M). The weighting of the index means that not all students with the same Total Score have the same SI. “Will a 1450 qualify?” is not the right question. Instead, look at whether a 750 RW and 700 M will qualify.
Summarizing the changes seen for the class of 2027
In October 2015 the PSAT moved to a 320-1520 scale, which was set to provide vertical alignment with the SAT’s 400-1600 scale. The class of 2017 was the first group of students taking the redesigned PSAT/NMSQT, so the fairest comparisons are in the last eleven class years.
This year saw the average Semifinalist cutoff hit a record low. It provided something of a mirror image to the class of 2026. Last year, 11 states set new record highs in the modern PSAT era, and 10 more tied their records. This year, 5 states established new lows, and 18 tied their record lows. Kansas and Minnesota both dropped 2 points below their previous lows, an unusual event for mid-sized states. Even more unusual was what happened in the largest dozen states. None of those has ever seen a drop of more than 3 points, but this year saw California, Illinois, and Michigan fall 4 points.
Results this year were closer to those in the class of 2024 than they were to the previous two years’ results. Recency is not always a predictor of future results. The Commended level, which is set nationally, declined 2 points this year to 208. The Semifinalist cutoffs, in contrast, fell 3 points.
Entry requirements for National Merit versus qualifying for National Merit.
Your PSAT/NMSQT score report tells you whether you meet the eligibility requirements for the NMSP. In general, juniors taking the October PSAT are eligible. If you have an asterisk next to your Selection Index, it means that your answers to the entrance questions have made you ineligible. Your answers are conveniently noted on your score report. If you think there is an error, you will also find instructions on how to contact NMSC. Meeting the eligibility requirements simply means that your score will be considered. Approximately 1.3 million students enter the competition each year. Only about 55,000 students will be named as Commended Students, Semifinalists, Finalists, or Scholars. See National Merit Explained for more information.
Why did the total number of Semifinalists decline?
After recognizing more than 17,000 Semifinalists in the prior two years, the class of 2027 saw only 16,230, a decline of 5%. The decline in Semifinalists is a separate issue from lower cutoffs. Setting cutoffs can be a blunt tool. In a large state, there may be more than 200-300 students at a single score. Small states might have multiple scores with zero students. NMSC can’t always hit its targets on the nose. Below are the largest swings in both directions.
How Semifinalists are allocated among states
It’s possible that NMSC recalibrated the total target number of Semifinalists this year. It helps to understand how National Merit sets cutoffs. NMSC allocates a target number of Semifinalists to states based on their population of high school students, not all of whom take the PSAT. If Texas is allocated 1,500 Semifinalists based on its population of high school graduates, then NMSC works down from a perfect 228 Selection Index until it gets as close as possible to that target. In the class of 2027, 1,462 students scored at or above the cutoff of 219. A cutoff of 220 would have produced too few Semifinalists. A cutoff of 218 would have gone over the allocation. As scores go lower, more and more students occupy each level, and where the crowd forms does not stay consistent from year to year. It is easy for cutoffs to move up or down a point even when there is minimal change in testing behavior or performance. All students at or above a cutoff qualify.
The changes in the above chart fit within the historical pattern, so students should expect similar swings to happen in the future. New Jersey had about the same number of Semifinalists in 2023 as it saw this year, and actually fell from a greater height compared to 2022. Similarly, Texas saw fewer than 1,462 Semifinalists in classes of 2020, 2021, and 2022. And there is little chance that NMSC calculated that Texas’ high school population was falling faster than, say, California’s. We won’t know until next September whether the 16,230 Semifinalists was a fluke or a new standard.
The Mystery of the Declining PSAT Scores
When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. National Merit cutoffs may not have the makings of a Sherlock Holmes novel. The guilty party is too easy to identify and the deduction not all that improbable. To borrow from another mystery trope: it’s College Board in the testing room with a faulty scale.
When test scores change from year-to-year, College Board issues press releases discussing testing patterns and student achievement. What they never include is “That one’s on us.” When it comes to National Merit scores, however, it often is.
A history of change
Over the last seventeen years, there have been six classes that saw cutoffs change in more than forty states. The heat strip below shows how cutoffs shift from year to year.
Even if we eliminate “bounce back” years where scores come back into line after an unusual shift, a major disruption occurs approximately every 4 years. Interestingly, none of those scoring disruptions can be attached to the biggest behavioral disruption of all — the Covid cancellations that drove PSAT/NMSQT volumes below one million for the first time in decades. In addition to last year’s exam, the PSATs from 2011 (class of 2013), 2016 (class of 2018), and 2019 (class of 2021) stand out as problematic. The anomalous 2019 results could be traced back to a particularly mis-scaled form, which I wrote about at the time. The class of 2014 also saw significant changes, but those were more of a bounce-back from the previous year, similar to what we are seeing with the class of 2027.
When Semifinalist cutoffs reached vertiginous levels last year, several theories made the rounds:
- (A) Covid-related learning losses were vanquished
- (B) The integrated Desmos calculator on the digital PSAT had “broken” the Math section
- (C) Test preparation — and maybe AI-enabled test preparation — had made the test too easy
- (D) The test taking population shifted
Compass disputed each of these theories, but it wasn’t until this year’s free-fall that we could put each of them fully to rest. A key piece of evidence is which scores rose and fell.
Over the most recent three PSATs, the highest reported Math scores (College Board groups all 700-760 scores together) did go up on the October 2024 PSAT, but they settled back down on the October 2025 PSAT. If improving Math skills were the key driver, why did they not keep progressing upward? The fall PSAT also provides an inherent double-check, because sophomores and juniors both take the exam in similar numbers. Sophomores and juniors consistently tracked each other across the different exams. The class of 2025 and 2026 overlapped, then 2026 and 2027, and then 2027 and 2028. Every PSAT the movement has been similar. Yet sophomores do not do test preparation in sufficient force to shape score results. The sets of classes were in different points of math development during remote learning, and yet they showed the same rises and falls. Learning loss and test preparation do not provide coherent answers.
Reading & Writing scores were the true driver of the class of 2026 records and the 2027 declines
High RW scores are typically less common than high Math scores. But on the October 2024 PSAT, almost as many students scored 700-760 on RW as on Math. Top scores went up by 18%. The double-weight that RW scores provide in the Selection Index pushed cutoffs to new highs. The 210 Commended ranked only fourth when compared to the previous decade. Earlier class years saw cutoffs of 211 and 212 (twice). So why did last year’s cutoffs rise to levels that had seemed impossible? The highest cutoffs had never exceeded 223 (Maryland’s 224 in the class of 2022 was due to every PSAT in the state being cancelled and students qualifying via SAT scores). How did New Jersey and Massachusetts reach 225 and California, Maryland, Virginia, and Washington end up at 224? The best explanation is that the very top RW scores — 740-760 — increased at an even higher rate than 700-730s. A 225 cutoff is not possible without at least a 750 RW. A 224 requires at least a 740 RW. Students were acing the test in record numbers.
The plummet for the class of 2027
On the 2025 PSAT, the number of high RW scores dropped by 27%. In fact, the RW count for the class of 2027 is even lower than it was two years ago. The surfeit of 700+ scores dried up. Obtaining a 740-760 grew harder. As with Math scores, sophomore performance changes matched that of juniors.
Process of elimination
The rapid gains and collapse eliminate (A), (B), and (C). As sophomores, the class of 2027 was phenomenal at reading according to the PSAT. Post-Covid learning changes cannot explain why they suddenly struggled as juniors. Option (B) doesn’t fit, because Math scores were not the source of the changes. Why would test preparation have stopped working (C), and how can it explain that sophomores and juniors were similarly impacted across the years? This leaves (D) as a remote contender. Except that it fails to explain the 50-state reach of the changes and the magnitude of the changes even in the largest states.
Thirteen of the largest fifteen states dropped by 3 points or more. Pennsylvania and New Jersey saw 2-point declines. If the smaller states were pulling down the class of 2027’s average cutoffs, we might at least attribute some of the disruption to the instability of cutoffs when there are fewer than 100 Semifinalists. That’s not what happened. And if only a few large states saw inflows or outflows of top test takers, the impact would have been muted. Nor did overall test taker numbers change much. When the entire set of large states has this magnitude of a change, the test scale itself has to be at the heart of it.
What does a 3-point change represent and why is it so bad?
For simplicity, the change can be characterized as a 15-point miss in RW on the 160-760 scale (200-800 on the SAT).
- The typical annual growth in RW scores is about 40-50 points, so the scale change represents approximately one-third of an academic year.
- Systematic scaling error is additive to individual student fluctuations in scores — typically around +/-30 points on each side of the PSAT and SAT. Scaling error makes it harder for students to determine where they will score and how their score stacks up.
- Scaling error produces incorrect percentile ranks, because percentiles are based on the 3 prior years of results. Sudden inflation or deflation gives an inaccurate read.
- The PSAT is used for purposes beyond National Merit such as AP placement or state-mandated testing. Results may not align with prior years or academic growth expectations.
- When error happens primarily on one side of the PSAT, some students are unfairly disadvantaged.
- In a competition such as National Merit where relative standing matters, a uniform increase or decrease might be tolerable. A rising tide lifts all students (sort of). Except that there is no way of knowing whether the error applied equally to all students. The digital PSAT is not a single form or even a limited set of forms. Exams across the PSAT testing window can vary, and even on the same test dates, students often see differing questions. It’s one of the security advantages provided by digital testing, but it can also be a curse. College Board provides no reporting on the items or scaling, so students (and Compass) have no way of assessing the impact on individuals. Schools have no way of knowing if their students were hit harder than at other schools.
- This keeps happening. Is College Board having difficulty keeping the digital PSAT scale consistent or will things stay more consistent over time? The historical record says that they will not.
Do these sorts of systematic scaling errors occur on the SAT?
They do. They are harder to spot, but likely even more common. Noted above is that the largest disruptions on the PSAT/NMSQT occur, on average, every 4 years. The SAT is given on (a) 8 national dates every year, (b) during a 2-month SAT School Day window in the spring, and (c) during a 1-month window in the fall. This accelerates the chance for errors. It creates a near certainty that some students will encounter systematic error in their favor and others will see it working against them.
The PSAT and the National Merit Scholarship Program provide a unique laboratory. The PSAT/NMSQT represents one slice in time. The population of PSAT takers is relatively stable from year to year, and the sophomore and junior PSATs provide a sort of longitudinal double-check. The 50 state cutoffs and their varying levels give information about the extent of scaling errors. Comparing ever-shifting SAT dates is difficult, especially because College Board restricts access to the data. It is unfortunate that the primary protection students have is taking the SAT multiple times. In combination with superscoring, it represents the best way for students to lock-in positive error.
How do errors happen? Shouldn’t scores stay consistent?
When new tests are designed, not every problem can be tested on previous populations of students. Instead, a sampling of problems is tested with a sampling of students, perhaps 4-5,000. In theory, that’s a significant enough size that random error will make little difference. The sample group should be comparable to the entire population. Random error is an acceptable part of test creation, because it largely cancels out at scale.
But what if the error is not random? What if the test design is flawed? For example, if the methodology continually overestimates the ability of the sample groups, future questions will be predicted to be harder than they really are. And then over-prediction may happen with the next group. This systematic bias can creep into a test production and equating process. Normally it is spotted. As we see from the October 2024 PSAT and similar examples, sometimes it is not. The National Merit program provides a challenge to test creators, because everything important happens in a narrow part of the scale. On the digital PSAT, only 50 questions count toward a student’s score. Differentiating between a 720 student, for example, and a 730 student, and a 740 student rests on small differences in performance. If College Board has the statistics even slightly off, scores will not align well across tests. We saw the occasional wild ride on the paper PSAT, but the rides may get wilder and more frequent on the digital PSAT.
Predictions and timeline for the class of 2028 and beyond
Compass has always warned students not to be too fixated on a single cutoff target. The crazy events of the last two years have made it obvious that cutoffs can move in large and unexpected ways. It’s better to think in terms of score ranges rather than a pass/fail score. Prior to the PSAT, we can only estimate based on historical figures, without knowing what kind of surprises College Board has in store. After the PSAT, Compass analyzes the national results in the broad buckets that College Board provides. This usually gives a clear idea of which way the overall trend is moving. We should see how RW and Math scores behave, what the 1400-1520 bucket looks like, and develop a tight estimate of the Commended cutoff. For example, here is the estimate from last year.
Unfortunately, it does not provide insight into individual states. In April, the Commended level usually leaks, and we get confirmation of the national trend predictions. It’s not until Semifinalist notifications start being handed out in late August that state-by-state information starts coming into focus.
Below is a pre-PSAT summary. Find the range of potential cutoffs in your state, and how it has stacked up in recent class years. Below the table is more information about the National Merit program. You may also want to consult our post on National Merit Explained, which goes more into the steps of the process, what different honors mean, and what sort of scholarships are available.
State | Class of 2028 (Est Range) | Class of 2027 (Actual) | Class of 2026 (Actual) | Class of 2025 (Actual) | Class of 2024 (Actual) | Avg SF Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 209-216 | 210 | 214 | 212 | 210 | 239 |
| Alaska | 207-217 | 208 | 215 | 214 | 209 | 36 |
| Arizona | 214-220 | 215 | 218 | 217 | 216 | 359 |
| Arkansas | 209-215 | 210 | 215 | 213 | 210 | 145 |
| California | 219-224 | 220 | 224 | 221 | 221 | 2,125 |
| Colorado | 216-221 | 217 | 219 | 218 | 216 | 280 |
| Connecticut | 219-223 | 220 | 223 | 221 | 221 | 182 |
| Delaware | 218-222 | 219 | 220 | 219 | 219 | 43 |
| Florida | 215-219 | 216 | 219 | 217 | 216 | 959 |
| Georgia | 216-220 | 217 | 220 | 218 | 217 | 554 |
| Hawaii | 215-220 | 218 | 219 | 217 | 217 | 62 |
| Idaho | 210-216 | 211 | 215 | 213 | 211 | 90 |
| Illinois | 217-222 | 218 | 222 | 220 | 219 | 693 |
| Indiana | 214-219 | 215 | 218 | 217 | 216 | 320 |
| Iowa | 209-216 | 210 | 214 | 212 | 210 | 152 |
| Kansas | 211-219 | 212 | 216 | 215 | 214 | 147 |
| Kentucky | 210-218 | 211 | 214 | 213 | 211 | 208 |
| Louisiana | 210-217 | 211 | 216 | 214 | 214 | 227 |
| Maine | 211-217 | 214 | 217 | 214 | 213 | 61 |
| Maryland | 220-224 | 221 | 224 | 222 | 221 | 313 |
| Massachusetts | 220-225 | 221 | 225 | 223 | 222 | 322 |
| Michigan | 215-220 | 216 | 220 | 218 | 217 | 509 |
| Minnesota | 213-220 | 214 | 219 | 217 | 216 | 284 |
| Mississippi | 209-215 | 211 | 213 | 212 | 209 | 149 |
| Missouri | 213-217 | 214 | 217 | 215 | 214 | 299 |
| Montana | 207-214 | 208 | 213 | 209 | 209 | 46 |
| Nebraska | 210-216 | 212 | 214 | 211 | 210 | 105 |
| Nevada | 210-218 | 211 | 214 | 214 | 211 | 148 |
| New Hampshire | 213-219 | 215 | 219 | 217 | 215 | 64 |
| New Jersey | 222-225 | 223 | 225 | 223 | 223 | 486 |
| New Mexico | 207-215 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 207 | 99 |
| New York | 219-223 | 220 | 223 | 220 | 220 | 998 |
| North Carolina | 216-220 | 217 | 220 | 218 | 217 | 502 |
| North Dakota | 207-212 | 208 | 210 | 210 | 207 | 28 |
| Ohio | 215-219 | 216 | 219 | 217 | 216 | 588 |
| Oklahoma | 208-216 | 210 | 212 | 211 | 208 | 195 |
| Oregon | 215-221 | 216 | 219 | 216 | 216 | 185 |
| Pennsylvania | 217-221 | 219 | 221 | 219 | 219 | 623 |
| Rhode Island | 212-220 | 213 | 219 | 217 | 215 | 50 |
| South Carolina | 209-217 | 212 | 215 | 214 | 209 | 225 |
| South Dakota | 208-215 | 210 | 211 | 208 | 209 | 39 |
| Tennessee | 213-219 | 214 | 219 | 217 | 217 | 324 |
| Texas | 218-222 | 219 | 222 | 219 | 219 | 1,508 |
| Utah | 208-216 | 209 | 213 | 211 | 209 | 181 |
| Vermont | 211-217 | 212 | 216 | 215 | 212 | 30 |
| Virginia | 219-224 | 221 | 224 | 222 | 219 | 412 |
| Washington | 220-224 | 221 | 224 | 222 | 220 | 353 |
| West Virginia | 207-212 | 208 | 210 | 209 | 207 | 64 |
| Wisconsin | 211-217 | 212 | 215 | 214 | 213 | 295 |
| Wyoming | 207-213 | 208 | 210 | 209 | 207 | 21 |
| District of Columbia | 222-225 | 223 | 225 | 223 | 223 | 36 |
| Studying Abroad | 222-225 | 223 | 225 | 223 | 223 | 87 |
| U.S. Territories | 207-212 | 208 | 210 | 208 | 207 | 39 |
| Commended | 207-212 | 208 | 210 | 208 | 207 |
How cutoffs are determined
Qualifying scores (“cutoffs”) are not based on the total score for the PSAT (320-1520) but on the Selection Index, which is calculated by doubling the RW score, adding the Math score, and then dividing the sum by 10. The maximum Selection Index is 228. Students can find a historical set of cutoff data here or see how Semifinalist and Commended counts have changed state by state. Students still ahead of the October PSAT can prepare with small group PSAT classes built around the Selection Index.
Why does each state have its own Semifinalist cutoff if the program is NATIONAL Merit?
This is always a hot button question. NMSC allocates the approximately 16,500 Semifinalists among states based on the number of high school graduates. That way, students across the nation are represented. It also means that there are very different qualifying standards from state to state. A Massachusetts student with a 220 might miss out on being a Semifinalist. If she lived 10 miles away in New Hampshire, she would qualify.
No Semifinalist cutoff can be lower than the national Commended level. Cutoffs for the District of Columbia and for U.S. students studying abroad are set at the highest state cutoff (typically New Jersey). The cutoff for students in U.S. territories and possessions falls at the Commended level each year. Boarding schools are grouped by region. The cutoff for a given region is the highest state cutoff within the region.
When are National Merit Semifinalists announced?
The lists of Semifinalists will not be distributed to high schools until the end of August 2027. With the exception of homeschoolers, students do not receive direct notification. NMSC asks that schools not share the results publicly until the end of the press embargo in mid-September, but schools are allowed to notify students privately before that date. NMSC does not send Commended Student letters to high schools until mid-September. Compass will keep students updated on developments as the dates approach.
Do state and national percentiles indicate whether a student will be a National Merit Semifinalist?
No! Approximately 1% of test takers qualify as Semifinalists each year, so it is tempting to view a 99th percentile score as indicating a high enough score — especially now that College Board provides students with percentiles by state. There are any number of flaws that rule out using percentiles as a quick way of determining National Merit status.
- Percentiles are based on section scores or total score, not Selection Index
- Percentiles are rounded. There is a large difference, from a National Merit perspective, between the top 0.51% and the top 1.49%
- Percentiles reveal the percentage of students at or below a certain score, but the “at” part is important when NMSC is determining cutoffs.
- The number of Semifinalists is based on the number of high school graduates in a state, not the number of PSAT takers. Percentiles are based on PSAT takers. States have widely varying participation rates.
- Most definitive of all: Percentiles do not reflect the current year’s scores! They are based on the prior 3 years’ performance. They are set even before the test is given. And if you are going to use prior history, why not use the record of prior National Merit cutoffs rather than the highly suspect percentiles?
Entry requirements for National Merit versus qualifying for National Merit.
Your PSAT/NMSQT score report tells you whether you meet the eligibility requirements for the NMSP. In general, juniors taking the October PSAT are eligible. If you have an asterisk next to your Selection Index, it means that your answers to the entrance questions have made you ineligible. Your answers are conveniently noted on your score report. If you think there is an error, you will also find instructions on how to contact NMSC. Meeting the eligibility requirements simply means that your score will be considered. Approximately 1.3 million students enter the competition each year. Only about 55,000 students will be named as Commended Students, Semifinalists, Finalists, or Scholars. See National Merit Explained for more information.
Just found out that a 220 qualifies in GA (could well be lower). Thanks for all the updates.
Thank you, Ross! That’s great to know.
florida updates? any updates?
Just confirmed 217 as the cutoff for Florida this year.
What do you think about a 213 in Louisiana? What are the odds that that it goes down this year?
Thomas,
I just published results. Unfortunately, only 1 state (South Dakota) saw a decrease this year. Louisiana’s cutoff remained at 214.
Hi Art, do you think 215 in Florida has a chance? Thank you
A.N.,
I just now published results that show Florida’s cutoff hit 217 this year.
Hi Art,
How sure are you of this report. My son got a 216 in Florida and we have not heard back from his school so we are just making sure that 217 is the cutoff for semifinalist. Thank you for all that you have done during this process.
John,
Quite sure. Your son did a great job and will be a Commended Student. Many schools don’t announce anything until the press announcement on September 11th. Commended Students often need to wait a bit longer, because NMSC mails those letters to schools only after Semifinalists are announced.
Hi Art
Is this score final or preliminary. I called national merit office and they said that they will only announce on 09/11
Sam,
Results are announced by NMSC on 9/11. In most cases, schools already have the results from their students, but many choose to wait. The numbers released on 9/11 will match the numbers here. These are not estimates.
To become a National Merit Finalist, does a National Merit Semifinalist need to take the SAT, or is the ACT sufficient if additional criteria are met?
The ACT is sufficient (NMSC added it several years ago as an option). Check out my FAQ on how to calculate a Selection Index with an ACT score, as it gets confusing.
Hi Art,
What are my chances of qualifying as semi-finalist in Indiana with an index score of 216? Since 216 was the cutoff last year and the digital PSAT caused the commended cutoff to increase, are my chances slim?
IN,
Unfortunately, Indiana’s cutoff came in at 217 this year.
Hi Art, in reading posts from previous years there is reference to a chart that you updated for each state as you got cutoff information (>=* etc). Will you be doing that again this year, and if so where would I find that? Thanks again for all your stellar efforts for us anxious parents and students. 😃
Eric,
Updates just posted. Thank you for the kind words.
Are these the actual cutoff scores or just updated expected cutoff scores? Crossing fingers Texas is 219!
Actual. Congratulations!
Hi Art,
What minimum corresponding SAT score do we have to get in order to be eligible for finalist in the event we make it to being semifinalist. Right now, my highest SAT score is a 1460 – 1470 if superscored. I want to apply, but not sure I will be in the running for the next step.
Hillie,
I discuss this more in another post. First, NM does not superscore. They will look at your best results from a single test date. The threshold is usually set at the Commended level (208 this year). So take your SAT scores and convert them into a Selection Index like you would a PSAT score: double the RW, add the math, drop a 0. NM will use the best one. Just remember to send them an official score report from College Board!
Thank you Art
My son made the cutoff. He also just received his results from his last SAT and it was his best score.
Should we wait until he has an NMSC account before sending his SAT scores to NMSC?
John,
Double congratulations! NMSC will be able to match his scores, even if you send them now.
I am assuming we can send All of the test dates for both ACT and SAT to NMSC?
Using your calculator it turns out his finest ACT has a higher SSI (234) than the SAT (230)
I can either:
1. Send All scores (SAT and ACT ) and let NMSC sort it all out
2. Send the highest score for both tests.
Thank you
There is no wrong answer here, because all of the scores easily clear the bar. I’d probably opt for simplicity and go with #3: Send the top ACT score (it’s higher than the SAT score and there is no need to send more than one date). Choosing #1 or #2 will end up with the same result, just with some extra fees.
Hi Art. My son qualified as a semifinalist and is filling out his application and wants to send his SAT scores in but we are not seeing exactly what the qualifying SAT score is in the application or the information that was provided. How can we obtain that information? His SAT score is above the commended 208 but wants to verify before sending. I am assuming it is set around the commended due to the variations in cutoffs for semifinalists throughout the country and beyond. Thank you for all of your help and guidance with this. It is a little daunting making sure we are doing everything correctly.
JK,
I would recommend calling National Merit to get confirmation. Yes, it is usually set at the Commended level, but I don’t want to state that definitively until I’ve heard it confirmed for this year. Sending scores that are too low is not a negative — NMSC doesn’t hold it against anyone — but of course your son would need to retest if the SAT scores end up being below the confirming cutoff.
Thank you so much Art. Just read the update and glad to let you know my daughter made it in TX with score of 219.
Congratulations to your daughter, Ron! Best of luck for the next stage.
Hi Art,
Is it officially posted anywhere ? My kid is exactly 223 from NJ. I was very nervous for a while fearing what if the cutoff jumps 1point upward in the range. If she is exactly 223, please confirm she qualifies as a semifinalist. Thank you for keeping us updated instantly.
Paddy,
If she is at 223, she will be a Semifinalist. Congratulations!
Hello Art,
Do you happen to know if there is any change for the essay prompt? (As compared to your FAQ?)
Scott,
I haven’t heard from any Semifinalists yet to confirm it for the class of 2025 (please stop back in once you know!). But I’ve been doing this a long time, and the prompt has never changed.
Essay Prompt seems exactly the same.
Thank you, OK Dad! That gives a nice heads-up to those who haven’t been notified yet.
Where do we see this if we haven’t been notified?
John,
You’ll receive login information once you get the letter from your school. Here is the prompt:
“To help the reviewers get to know you, describe an experience you have had, a person who has influenced you, or an obstacle you have overcome. Explain why this is meaningful to you. Use your own words and limit your response to the space provided.”
Thank you Art for your analysis and service every year. My student made it in Illinois and we didn’t expect a jump of one point 🙃. For my other student few years ago the cut off was quite a few points lower. I wonder if this will cause fewer in Illinois to qualify or this means more students fared well. Either way congrats to all who made it and those who didn’t no worries things work out well anyways.
Shweta,
Congratulations to your student! It probably leans more to the “Illinois students fared well” or more students took the test. NMSC has a target number of students that qualify each year in Illinois (although it can’t match that target exactly given the all or nothing nature of a cutoff).
Your article suggests that the NJ cutoff increased this year (“There were no new records this year, although four states did tie their previous highs: Massachusetts (+1) New Jersey (+1), Virginia (+3), and Washington (+2).” However, the table indicates that NJ is the same as prior year (223). Can you clarify?
Good catch! The parenthetical should be “(unchanged).” New Jersey’s cutoff is 223. The table is accurate. In my rush to get things out, I did the math in that sentence based on NJ’s 222 previous low rather than on the previous year’s cutoff. Fixed.
Hello Art,
Is the essay prompt similar in nature to the Common App essay?
It’s very general, so the Common App essay can often be tailored to work. In previous years it has remained: “To help the reviewers get to know you, describe an experience you have had, a person who has influenced you, or an obstacle you have overcome. Explain why this is meaningful to you. Use your own words and limit your response to the space provided.”
We are from Maryland and my kid’s score is 222. Is he in? We have not heard anything from the school yet.
MG,
Congratulations to your student! It’s back-to-school time, so many schools are just now receiving and processing the information (it still goes by snail mail). Many also choose to wait until September 11th to make the announcement.
Now that the dust has settled, I just want to thank you again for all of the information and support you provide. Having a calm, scientific mind bring sense to this process has been much appreciated. Still not sure why we have to be tortured with the uncertainty for 11 months, but I’m very thankful you were there to help guide us. Thank you!
Thank you, PK. One of the reasons I started doing this was because of how “Wild West” it was many years ago.
Hi Art,
Got a 222 and I’m a US citizen living abroad. Is it at all possible to qualify anyway for Semi-Finalist? Either way, happy that I at least have Commended.
Liz,
Students studying abroad face such a high bar every year. Unfortunately, the 223 cutoff this year means that your score falls just short of qualifying for Semifinalist status. Yes, you should be proud of your score and your Commended Student achievement. And I have to imagine that your experience living abroad opens up all kind of college opportunities.
Hey Art I know you’ve gotten this question a million times by now but I got a 211 in Oklahoma which is the exact cutoff you posted here. Are you absolutely certain that these cutoffs are true? Sorry for being so paranoid, I just want to be certain before celebrating! Thank you so much for the work that you’re doing.
A/N,
Certain. Congratulations!
Thank you so much!! Thrilled and so relieved.
How long will it be until schools notify students? Here it says I qualified but I haven’t heard anything from school.
Cameron,
It’s up to the school, but many will wait until September 11th, which is when the press embargo ends. If you don’t hear by the 12th, you can ask your college counselor. If you aren’t able to get an answer from your school, you can call NMSC, but they will definitely not give out the information before the 11th.
Hi Art,
Do you have any info on the number of alternate entry applicants this year? With it being the first year of digital testing and all the technical/connection difficulties that high schools across the country experienced last fall, I wonder if that led to an unusually high number of alternate entries and thus the higher than expected cut-offs.
Curious,
Interesting. That’s not a number that I’ve ever seen released, although we will have a partial proxy. When NMSC sends out the student lists to press outlets, it includes a code for the intended field of study. That’s something students have the opportunity to fill out on the day of the PSAT. It ends up as 000 for most students unable to take the PSAT. AFAIK, not all 000s are AE and not all AEs are 000, but it gives a rough idea. We won’t see those show up until next week. [An historical example.]
There is not a sure tell in the cutoffs. We didn’t see, in other words, the equivalent of MD=224 from 2021. We saw enough students scoring above 1400 on the actual PSAT that the overall score levels are not out of whack. They were puzzling in light of the 208 Commended level. And AE doesn’t help much to explain the odd SD/WV/WY outcome. Maybe I’ll change my tune if we see a disproportionate number of 000s in WV/WY.
My thinking is the commended score was determined last spring *before* the window closed for AE score submission in June. Perhaps I’m going too far down the rabbit hole!
Rabbit holes can be fun. You are correct that Commended is determined before AE. The number of students with PSAT scores — 1,490,000 — tells me that the outages were not widespread enough to cause large disruptions. It’s also true that the disruptions don’t have to be large — the right students at the right schools missing the PSAT would increase the level of high-scoring AE students. My point is simply that I don’t think we need to turn to AE to explain the cutoffs. With 50,600 1400+ scorers, this year looked a lot like the class of 2021, which would be a bit closer to where the cutoffs were for the class of 2025. Could AE have caused the extra bump in states like VA and WA? Possibly.
Hi Art, are these cutoffs final for 2025 or there might be a change until the school announces it?
My daughter has selection index 224 in California and she says she did not get the ‘slip’ for National Merit from school which apparently other students got.
Elana,
Yes, they are final. I would wait until Wednesday and then follow up with the school. There could be a simple reason why she was overlooked in the initial notices. Her online PSAT report will flag whether or not National Merit considers her as eligible based on her class year (for example, some students may have the wrong year listed). What I want to emphasize is that any such problems can be dealt with — and NMSC sees plenty of them every year. Start with the school. If you run into problems, contact NMSC to confirm your daughter’s status. California is a state where we often see the full published list, so you may want to turn to Google on Wednesday. But if she is a junior with a 224, she will be a Semifinalist. Congratulations!
Thanks Art. I will wait until Wednesday.
Is the list officially out anywhere ? Our School in NJ has not announced anything yet. I see a list populated for Texas state online.
Paddy,
No, NMSC does not do a dump of all lists. Instead, it lets press outlets decide on what to publish. I recommend checking on the progress at https://www.reddit.com/r/psat/, which already has a few state lists linked.
Art, Where is the list of semifinalists posted?
Dave,
There is not a national list. There are state lists, but NMSC does not publish them directly. They send out each state list to local press outlets. It is completely up to the press outlet whether or not to publish at all, publish the entire list, or publish the names of local students. It can be difficult to find complete lists. I recommend checking https://www.reddit.com/r/psat/, which already has a few state lists linked.
Hi Art,
My daughter had food poisoning the day of the PSAT and went alternate entry. She took the SAT in November 2023. She scored a 730 verbal and 800 math. I called National Merit and was told they cap at 760 and double verbal and add math. That gives her a 222. We are in Maryland. We learned today that she did not make semifinalist, but rather commended. I called and they said that is not how they calculate alternate entry. They cap each individual section at 38. She had a 40 in Math, 39 in Writing, and 34 in Reading. Capping each at 38 that adds up to 110 and then they double that. Did they change the rules? We are so disappointed!
Mom,
I’m so sorry to hear that this happened to your daughter. I think I have an idea of how this happened, and it revolves around the timeline of when the PSAT went digital and when the SAT went digital.
The correct calculation of a digital PSAT and digital SAT Selection Index is (2RW + M)/10, where RW and M are capped at 760. There is no longer such a thing as separate R and W scores. So the representative you spoke to may have been thinking of that formula. But when the PSAT was still paper, the formula was (R + W + M) x 2. For the PSAT, the result is identical to the new formula. That is not true of the paper SAT, because it is correct that under that formula, each section is capped at 38. Your daughter’s Nov 2023 SAT was, of course, paper. I would at least try to make an appeal to NMSC that it is unfair that they are using different formulas for the PSAT and SAT for the class of 2025. Alas, I’m not optimistic.
Thanks for the quick response. Prior to digital, if you had an alternate entry, was it calculated using the 38 cap?
Yes, as was the PSAT SI prior to Oct 2023. This is the first class where the digital/paper divide has ever arisen.
I just looked back at the Guide to the National Merit Scholarship Program published September 2023. Each year when results are published, NMSC also talks about the rules for the upcoming year. They do, indeed, give the (2xRW + M)/10 formula for the Oct 2023 PSAT. In the section on Alternate Entry, NMSC does not discuss the details of how paper and digital SATs will be handled. Unless the AE instructions included the calculation for the paper SAT, then I do feel that you were misled. Again, I understand why NMSC did what they did, but I’m a big believer in transparency. And all of that aside, congratulations to your daughter for a fabulous SAT score!
“Program recognition
Beginning in October 2023, the psat/nmsqt will be administered digitally. Students will receive a Reading and Writing section score and a Math section score instead of Reading, Writing and Language, and Math Test scores. To maintain consistency with the range of Selection Index scores from prior years, nmsc will compute 2023 psat/nmsqt Selection Index scores by doubling the Reading and
Writing section score, adding the Math section score, and dividing the total by 10. Score levels sufficient for recognition vary from year to year and from state to state; those for the 2024 competition are given on pages 13–14.”
Hi Art. Just wanted to say thank you for the amazing job you do with this website, especially regarding the PSAT/NMSQT info. Today is the day that semifinalists are announced for the Class of 2025. Two years ago my daughter was a semifinalist, and your information correctly predicted it! Any parent/student who needs info about the NMS needs to look no further than this site. Thank you again, and congrats to all of this year’s semifinalists!
Thank you, Don! And this is not even a paid endorsement. 😉